Steven Spiers

News, Media and Opinions

Most people, including Lawyers and Solicitors really have no idea about God and the Crown, they will spout legislations and statutes like they are gospel and never ever question the foundations of that authority.

We are going to have to investigate the future by digging into the past and define specific facts that have been laid down before us. We are going to have to look into God and how the Commonwealth of Australia was forged by the Imperial (Tudor) Crown and how it was taken in war and peace.

Most people, those Lawyers and Solicitors will believe that because it is, it will be so, but the current state of affairs in this country requires lawful foundation which is backed up by the maxim that an institution void in the beginning cannot acquire validity from after matter.

Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one, but no one wants to see them. Which is why we must base our work on the facts available to us and make summary of those facts to define a conclusion.

To be able to do this we need to lay out a list of questions we would like to answer and then define the facts relative to those questions so that we can discover a summary of answers and come to a conclusion.

For this we must use the Scientific Method. This involves forming hypotheses based on observations, experimental and measurement based testing, and deductions drawn from hypotheses which are then refined for elimination of the hypotheses based on the findings.

We have obviously hypothesised that the current Australian Government is not the Government of the Commonwealth, but how do we go about proving this as fact. This is where as a science we must define through the law, public act and record and judicial record our findings.

Lets pose some questions to hypothesise. This would then give us an aim at proving with solid fact the answers.

Nature of the Federal Constitutional Matter:

To ignore a fact, is to be deliberately deceitful, or is otherwise delusional; is it not?  With these thoughts in mind, we intend to provide information for the peoples consideration in determining the outcomes of the future.


  1. Application of the Blessing of Almighty God and its usage in Oath of Allegiance of Ministers concerning the Differing Pledge of Allegiance offered to Residents of the States as subjects of the Crown and the Commonwealth of Australia.
  2. Application of the Preamble of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act and a Line of Authority to hold Rule of Law.
  3. Clause 5 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act regarding the validity of the operation of the line of authority within the States of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  4. Section 108 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act concerning the validity of the saving of State Laws within the Commonwealth of Australia.
  5. Section 117 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act concerning the Rights of Residents as subjects of the Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  6. Section 118 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act concerning the validity of the difference between Law, Public Acts and Records, and the Judiciary.
  7. Letters Patent 1900 and the Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia and the Public Seals of the States concerning the validity of the operation of a line of authority within the Commonwealth of Australia and its role in the Public Sector.
  8. Letters Patent 1984 of Australia concerning the validity of the Office of Governor General of Australia and the abandonment of the Office of the Governor General of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  9. Application of the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942 installed mid World War 2 and the actions of Robert Menzies former Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia during 1939 and relative to the action of Treason to the Realm of the Holy See of Australia.
  10. Application of the Australia Act 1986 concerning the rights of residents within the States to Referendum of change of a line of authority with the States of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  11. Application of the Shrine of Remembrance and the blessing of Almighty god and its usage to define the Realm of Australia and its Oath of Allegiance
  12. Application of the Authorized King James Bible and the Oath of Allegiance, its use in Oath of Office, and giving of evidence within the Judicial Systems.
  13. Application of the Treaty of Versailles 1919 and the declarations of Peace as an independent Nation leading to the Imperial Conference 1926 and Proclamation as separate Realm in 1927

This starts a list of questions that need to be determined in the discovery of answers through facts. If you the reader can pose more questions, add them to the comments below and we will put those questions to the scientific method as well.

As a first fact we can look at the Interpretation of Acts. And out of that we can define some specifics relative to the statement of law whether it statutory, public act and record, judicial decision or case law. We can begin to summarise a legal/lawful viewpoint on our findings.

Construction of Acts to be subject to Constitution
Every Act shall be read and construed subject to the Constitution, and so as not to exceed the legislative power of the Commonwealth, to the intent that where any enactment thereof would, but for this section, have been construed as being in excess of that power, it shall nevertheless be a valid enactment to the extent to which it is not in excess of that power.

For instance, we can summarise the following facts from the above clause of Commonwealth Act.

a)     Every Act is construed subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution.

b)     No Act can exceed the legislative power of the Commonwealth.

c)     An Act remains valid where it does not exceed the power of the Commonwealth.

So, as readers, have a think about the questions, and if you have any other questions you find relative to a constitutional matter that you believe need to be answered, add a comment below.

We can go through these post by post of facts and eventually summarise answers to these questions by relative and specific factually based claims.

It is only through specifically defining how this country changed and for the worse that we will be able to get to an answer of how to fix it. Knowing the Bible is also going to help on this foray into the scientific method of law as all law is based on the foundation of God.

Romans 13:1 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
13 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

We know this to be true through the Preamble to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 where in it states.

WHEREAS the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established:

From this we can further summarise more factual statements.

a)     The people of the States united not the States themselves.

b)     The unity relies on the blessing of Almighty God.

c)     The unity is indissoluble.

d)     The unity is a Federal Commonwealth

e)     The unity is under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland as at July 1900.

f)      The unity is under the Constitution at Clause 9 of the Act.

g)     A line of Authority is defined in God, King and Country.

This will give you all a chance to look at what a bible has to say about Government and how God became Grantor to the ideal of Governance.

Isaiah 9:6 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given:
and the government shall be upon his shoulder:
and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor,
The mighty God,
The everlasting Father,
The Prince of Peace.

The best way to advance from ignorance is to discuss this between each other and put all the information you have on the specific facts into one pot. From there you will be without ignorance and be able to determine through scientific method, or through the dissection of law the actual facts surrounding how we became a people in International Laws or Natural Law.

This post will continue into Part 2 as we start to lay out many of the facts surrounding becoming a people, and how that was eventually conned out of us. And hopefully open the eyes of the people to be able to return home to it, as well as pass this knowledge on to others.

The Lawyers and Solicitors are under Oath to God, but when we delve into the foundations of that God we are warned about the Lawyers who lie, and the Solicitors who solicit. For they are the ones who attempt to justify foundations through the laws they believe in rather than the foundations through God in which they take their oaths to.

Luke 7:30 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
30 But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God against themselves, being not baptized of him.

Luke 11:46 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
46 And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.

Luke 11:52 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

The irony here is that to be able to perform the actions of law, these lawyers and solicitors take Oaths of Office before Chief Justices whom are obligated to the finer details of the faith of god as the will and testimony to the estates of god.

Participate in the comments below and discuss with each other these things so that we can move forward as a people. A people that know what they were granted by the Holy Spirit of their ANZAC, a people that one day might return to what was granted to them.

The one thing I would suggest is to stop arguing with the Lawtards on facebook. It is very clear they either solely believe in man made laws, and not that testimony of the trinity of God which includes the Spirit of the ANZAC. And we were again warned clearly of this occurring.

Acts 4:19 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
19 But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye.

Acts 5:29 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
29 Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

1 Thessalonians 2:4 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
but as we were allowed of God to be put in trust with the gospel, even so we speak; not as pleasing men, but God, which trieth our hearts.

It is clear that the Commonwealth of Australia was forged under the blessing of Almighty God and the Royal Laws being the Scripture. It is through this comprehending that we will move forward with faith in God, faith in the Commonwealth and faith in each other.

Without that, there is no Team Commonwealth, a family under one father that forges a trinity including the Sons in Trust with God.

Visits: 1799

11 thoughts on “Facts Part 1

  1. To spectate is to sit on your hands and let your country be at the hands of those that know you sit on your hands. Is it time you all stopped spectating, protesting and whining. Is it time you started to act as Team Commonwealth and be the people that are in the image of your ANZAC. If you cannot do this, you dont return home, its that simple.

  2. Steven, a well put together answer to my post, however you mentioned SS 108 in your post not 106 and 107 which clearly states that all State Constitution must comply with the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution and that is the overriding of all the State Constitutions. Patented by Queen Victoria and further proclaimed by King George V to Queen Elizabeth ll.
    Secondly the Preamble clearly states ” Whereas we the people of the 6 States mentioned with the blessing of almighty God join in a indissoluble Constitution ” therefore it is the people who are the Commonwealth of Australia, not the States themselves.
    I do agree that God is the highest power, then the monarch who is the keeper of the faith and then comes the people. Parliaments are not Governments they are Legislators who work for the people.
    You mentioned the Versailles Document, The Westminster Act, the Lima Accord and the 1985/86 Australian Act and many more that the Corporation Government has introduced which is an act of not only treason against the people also the Crown and God.
    Remember the Preamble we the people, the States don’t formed the Federation it is the people and no Corporation Government is supreme to the people or even the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia it is the PEOPLE.
    I would also like to mention that the green Constitution put out is a revised Annotated Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia by Hawke and Keating in 1988 for Quick and Garran who died many years earlier ????? and certain words have been changed

    1. All your points are valid excepting, I have not mentioned the Lima Declaration.

      Nanny Government is what is said, and it is how it should be viewed. Children need to grow up and ask the nanny to leave.

      Green Constitution is of no concern, it is not a valid original document, and the original needs to take into consideration accepted practice, ie referendums.

  3. Of course there are other issues besides the [valid] ones quoted by Bernie. A rather obvious one is that Elizabeth II, abdicated the Crown in 1953, the year of her coronation. Reason? She allowed for the practice of usury, and in so doing violated her coronation oath and contract with God. The terms of the contract had clearly mandated that she would uphold the Laws of God. She promised to do so, and had signed the [book] contract. Archbishop: “Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel?” – The queen answered: “All this I promise to do.”- However,
    “If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury” – Exodus 22:25
    Violating her oath and contract constituted immediate abdication: “20. Thus saith the Lord; if ye can break my covenant of the day, and of the night, and that there should not be day and night in their season; 21. Then may also my covenant be broken with David my servant, that he should not have a son to reign upon his throne . . . “- Jeremiah Ch.33

    Furthermore, by virtue of the enactment of the: Acts Amendment and Repeal Court and Legal Practice Act 2003 (WA) the Governor and Legislature of WA committed an act of treason. This enactment removed the queen from all enactments and had instated the Governor as a substitute.

    Also in 1975 the Victorian Legislature had created a new constitution without referendum and without adhering to the conditions set forth in 1855 Constitution Act which mandated that changes could only be affected within the same 1855 [UK] Act. there was no authority granted to create an entirely different Victorian Constitution Act. It had further imposed the condition, that any changes had to be passed by the full number of Members in a joint session at the second and third reading. The Hansard of the Victorian Parliament show that there was no joint session, that the full number of Members was not present, and that instead of the changes be made in the 1855 UK Act, the Legislature had unlawfully created a new Victorian Constitution 1975 Act.
    In reality nothing stands on a foundation of law in Australia and the People are willfully controlled by de facto regimes. The Commonwealth of Australia that came to exist in 1901 has been replaced by a corporation which registration can be found at the SEC in the USA.

  4. What happened to the coat of arms on the Victorian. Constitution Act, it seems to have disappeared after the Australia Act came in, same as the Victorian Government Gazette..?

    1. Done a bit more digging on this and the most recent Vic. Gov. Gazettes do have the Victorian Coat of Arms displayed.
      However with regards to the Vic. Constitution Act, from the current version no. 223 in force going back to version no. 121. 01/07/1997 (as via legislation.vic.gov.au). None of these Vic. Constitution Acts have any State Coat of Arms on display at the header of the Act, to provide the Act a clear line of Authority. Why would you have a blank header on such an important Act?
      On AustLII in the Vic. Historical acts database, there a quite a few Vic. Constitution Acts available to view prior to the Australia Act which clearly display a Coat of Arms on each Act from Elizabeth II (St. Edwards Crown) to Edward VII (Imperial Crown) etc.
      Happy to email through the links and screen shots i have saved if interested.

      1. Do not forget this one thing. The people united in a federal commonwealth. The colonies lost their people. Then the commonwealth, a body of people then allowed those colonies to becomes party to the people by way of becoming States.

        The State SHOULD BE in a LINE OF AUTHORITY from God, to the State. There is a FRACTURED LINE OF AUTHORITY.

        1. I agree, it’s fractured alright. In your facts series you’ve touched on the State Coat of Arms and the public seals that were issued. I’m referring from this etc. I have since found the ‘Constitution (Local Government) Act 1988 No. 55 of 1988, Assented to 16 August 1988’ which does have the Victoria State Coat of Arms on display, so it has definitely been used and this is after the Australia Act.
          What I am trying to understand here is whether this is just lazy Gov. practice where the State Coat of Arms appears on some Acts, others not or is there something else to this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.