Throughout this series of facts you would have come to learn that the specific nature of the Crown is important when defining a line of authority through oaths in lineage of God which is first held through a coronation process.
The coronation defines the supreme head of the estate by title and must be in accordance with the foundations laid by the forefathers of the realm. We know this is important due to the sacrifice of men during battle. The loss of life and limb becomes a serious and evident part of the defined authority.
Blackstone’s Commentaries discusses the notion of allegiance which is relative to an oath and the difference between natural and local allegiance.
Numbers 30:13 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
13 Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, her husband may establish it, or her husband may make it void.
As we saw in Fact 14, the king is married to the people through a wedding ceremony we call a coronation. As above so below, so we see that the family estate has the same rules as the kingdom above it. And this is what is being brainwashed out of people. The acting in Estate with the Father and Wife as co-executors with voice as a household.
We can see in Blackstone’s Commentaries that allegiance forms the very core of the realm, for without it, we would not be a people. And through this allegiance we would not have public servants whom are obligated to Oaths of Office.
29. COMMENTARIES ON THE LAWS OF ENGLAND
Book 1, Chapter 10, Of the People, Whether Aliens, Denizens, or Natives
ALLEGIANCE, both express and implied, is however distinguished by the law into sorts or species, the one natural, the other local; the former being also perpetual, the latter temporary. Natural allegiance is such as is due from all men born within the king’s dominions immediately upon their birth.12 For, immediately upon their birth, they are under the king’s protection; at a time too, when (during their infancy) they are incapable of protecting themselves. Natural allegiance is therefore a debt of gratitude; which cannot be forfeited, canceled, or altered, by any change of time, place, or circumstance, nor by anything but the united concurrence of the legislature.13 An Englishman who removes to France, or to China, owes the same allegiance to the king to England there as at home, and twenty years hence as well as now. For it is a principle of universal law,14 that the natural-born subject of one prince cannot by any act of his own, no, not by swearing allegiance to another, put off or discharge his natural allegiance to the former: for this natural allegiance was intrinsic, and primitive, and antecedent to the other; and cannot be divested without the concurrent act of that prince to whom it was first due. Indeed the natural-born subject of one prince, to whom he owes allegiance, may be entangled by subjecting himself absolutely to another; but it is his own act that brings him into these straits and difficulties, of owing service to two masters; and it is unreasonable that, by such voluntary act of his own, he should be able at pleasure to unloose those bands, by which he is connected to his natural prince.
a) Natural allegiance is due from all men born within the king’s dominions immediately upon birth.
b) Natural allegiance is a debt of gratitude.
c) The natural-born subject of one prince, may be entangled by subjecting himself absolutely to another, but it is his own act that brings him into these straits and difficulties, of owing service to two masters.
We can see here that Natural Allegiance is due from all men born within the dominion, and that it becomes a debt of gratitude in God. The taking of another Oath doesn’t take from being born into the natural born allegiance of family and lineage. Natural allegiance is based in the fathers defence of the Realm and giving birth to Sons of the Realm, it is in the honour of the fathers defence that a natural allegiance is placed.
Ecclesiastes 8:2 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
2 I counsel thee to keep the king’s commandment, and that in regard of the oath of God.
As men take up office an begin to act in the Public Service they not only are considered to be under allegiance, they take oaths of office to promise to uphold their duties within the capacity of that office.
30. PROMISSORY OATHS ACT 1868
Penalty on not taking required Oath.
7If any Officer specified in the Schedule hereto declines or neglects, when any Oath required to be taken by him under this Act is duly tendered, to take such Oath, he shall, if he has already entered on his Office, vacate the same, and if he has not entered on the same be disqualified from entering on the same; but no Person shall be compelled, in respect of the same Appointment to the same Office, to take such Oath or make such Affirmation more Times than One.
a) There is penalty for not taking the required Oath
b) The Coronation Oath is the stem for the Line of Authority, the Root of Rule of Law.
c) This brings into question the Oath of Allegiance and Realm at which all Justices take Oath of Allegiance and brings into Question the Realm at which that Oath is linked.
We can see by the Promissory Oaths Act that not being under the correct line of authority has a consequence of not being in office. This puts those in office at a quandary in that they must vacate that office immediately.
All Judiciary, Ministers, Senators, Representative and so on face this problem if it is proven that the Oath of Office that they have taken is outside of the Imperial Tudor Crown established in the Kings Domain. And as we have demonstrated at Fact 26, we can without doubt prove that the Australian Imperial Crown Realm has been compassed with second cross filling in and replacing the Pool of Reflection in 1954.
We can further see by the Police Service Administration Act that it contradicts the Promissory Oaths Act 1868 in that proof of office is not required for a Police Officer to act in Office. The State of Queensland is basically stating to all and sundry that you do not question its Police Officers, that is unless these officers are in fact not party to the Constitutional State and Constitution and are in fact an incorporated entity at law.
31. POLICE SERVICE ADMINISTRATION ACT 1990 (QLD)
Oath of office
3.3 Oath of office
Before a person begins to perform duty as an officer, the person is to take, or make, and subscribe the oath or affirmation prescribed by regulation.
Proof of office
3.4 Proof of office
If a question arises as to a person’s identity as an officer, or to a person’s entitlement to exercise the powers or to perform the duties of an officer—
(a) the general reputation of a person, who is an officer, as being an officer is evidence of that identity and entitlement; and
(b) the absence of, or failure to produce, any written appointment or other documentary proof to establish that identity or entitlement does not prejudice or otherwise affect the exercise of the powers or the performance of the duties by a person who is an officer.
a) Police Service Administration Act 1990 Section 3.4 contradicts the Promissory Oaths Act 1868 Section 7.
b) Police Service Administration Act contradicts Oaths Act 1867
This would then prove a problem for not only Police Officers if they are in the wrong line of authority to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 but would also prove to be a massive problem for the Parliament of the Commonwealth and Government of the Commonwealth.
We know very well that these titles of the Australian Government and Parliament of Australia changed in Secret Meetings in 1973. Even the judicial branches of the Commonwealth of Australia queried this change.
This change is demonstrative of not actually acting within the Constitution at Clause 9 of the Act. And this puts at question the very obligations of every Representative and Minister currently sitting in a Parliament of a different name.
We have recently seen that these issues were put before the High Court of Australia which at the time did not even address concerns put to it by Steven, they effectively rejected emails relative to their Oath of Office within 2 hours of being emailed to them during month long investigations into the Allegiance of sitting members.
32. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 42
Oath or affirmation of allegiance
Every senator and every member of the House of Representatives shall before taking his seat make and subscribe before the Governor-General, or some person authorised by him, an oath or affirmation of allegiance in the form set forth in the schedule to this Constitution.
a) Every member of the Government is obligated to an Oath
b) Every member is under the Crown by their obligation to Oath
c) Every member is to uphold the foundations in the Constitution under the blessing of Almighty God.
d) Ministers of Parliament are Ministers of God.
We can see by the Preamble that the Oath of Allegiance has a line of Authority and we can see by Facts 25 & 26 that the Oath is relative to a line of authority founded in God. We can also see that ANZAC form a part of that trinity in god at Fact 28.
It is therefore very obvious to those that discover these things that all Ministers, Representative and Senators are clearly outside of office and by law are required to vacate office immediately. It is also clear that the High Court of Australia is not standing in God, and that it has used the sacking of Senators over their double citizenship as a way to maintain a false control over the Realm through what could clearly be called a Foreign Parliament to the foundations set in the Constitution at Clause 9 of the Act.
Matthew 14:7 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
7 Whereupon he promised with an oath to give her whatsoever she would ask.
33. COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 44
Any person who:
(i) is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power; or
(ii) is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer; or
(iii) is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent; or
(iv) holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the revenues of the Commonwealth; or
(v) has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons;
shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
But subsection (iv) does not apply to the office of any of the Queen’s Ministers of State for the Commonwealth, or of any of the Queen’s Ministers for a State, or to the receipt of pay, half pay, or a pension, by any person as an officer or member of the Queen’s navy or army, or to the receipt of pay as an officer or member of the naval or military forces of the Commonwealth by any person whose services are not wholly employed by the Commonwealth.
a) Acknowledgement of Allegiance is defined in the Preamble
b) Acknowledgement of Allegiance is defined in the Schedule Oath
c) A line of authority is defined in the Preamble and the Schedule.
Section 44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution at Clause 9 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 and the defined Preamble demonstrating lineage of authority would therefore put every single one of them under the allegiance, obedience and adherence to a foreign power in the Commonwealth of Australia.
They have joined the Parliament of Australia, and not the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. They sit under the power of the Governor-General of Australia instead of the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia and have directly disobeyed the covenant sealed by God.
It would be akin to working for Woolworths, and then taking Oath to Coles to undermine Woolworths. It would be akin to running Woolworths from a Coles boardroom.
1 Kings 13:11 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
11 Now there dwelt an old prophet in Beth-el; and his sons came and told him all the works that the man of God had done that day in Beth-el: the words which he had spoken unto the king, them they told also to their father.
The Facts leading up to this are undeniable, and the biblical texts, the royal law in the scripture are very clear on the compassing of the Shrine of Remembrance and the Stone of Remembrance. We can see the Stone of Scone has power and influence within the Holy See of Australia. We can see the Scottish Arms within Court Rooms across the States putting them in a foreign realm.
As we move forward we will discover more in relation to this. But so far we can see this is undoubted evidence. And put together demonstrates a serious problem within the Commonwealth of Australia under an Australian Government not in line with the Covenant of God in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act defined by Debates of Federation in 1898 and followed by defence of that Covenant by the Spirit of the ANZAC.
If you like what you see in this Facts Series, show your support through a donation or a go to our online store and purchase a shirt. The continued work of Steven can only occur with that support.
Your support helps bring all of this to light, and allows Steven to continue to question those in power as to their lawful right to hold all Australians under authority. Our Servants have become our masters in our own ignorance of our very foundations.
Without your support the ability to question this Australian Government and the Courts of this Australia is not possible. As is demonstrated by the content being provided, it is a factual expose of the state of affairs that we find ourselves in and has caused the Attorney-General of Australia to remain in silence. The court systems of Australia holding men and women as employees of incorporated bodies beholden to corporate policies under police interaction.
With these Facts Posts, it is hoped that you as a people start to see where a unity can be found and how lawfully we can challenge this governance and return to a form of self governance with Gods Covenant.