Steven Spiers

News, Media and Opinions

Opinions or facts dilemma as a person standing at a crossroad or junction between opinion and fact signs with opposite arrow directions as an evidence or proof metaphor with 3D illustration elements.

Firstly, apologies for the big gap in releasing the Facts series, I have been a bit busy organising a few things. Those of you reading the series will have noticed that by now we have defined how some of the countries foundations were put in place and how a line of authority relies on these elements at law.

After the separation by Imperial Conference and the Statute of Westminster 1931, the Commonwealth of Australia became an independent and sovereign country as is demonstrated by the joining of the League of Nations in 1919. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 UK/PGA and the Constitution thereby established became the body of the sovereign people of the Commonwealth of Australia under the blessing of Almighty God, and this newly founded sovereignty displayed in the Kings Domain Melbourne.

Genesis 1:9 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

We know that the Constitution defines that changes to the federal body and constitutional foundations are required to undergo performance of Clause 128 of the Constitution at Clause 9 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 UK/PGA. A line of authority had been established under the blessing of Almighty God as demonstrated by the Shrine of Remembrance 1934 in the Kings Domain Melbourne linking God, King and Country together.

We have also learnt that the States are owned by the Commonwealth, and that the Commonwealth by unity is the body of the People of Australia. It is without doubt that the people of the colonies united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia, and that the Colonies were allowed by the people under the Constitution to join the Commonwealth and become States of that Commonwealth relinquishing former lineage of authority to that of the Commonwealth of Australia. We have demonstrated this to be traditio bravi manu, or delivered by the short hand to the Commonwealth of Australia.

When we look at the Australia Act 1986, we must look back to the beginnings wherein it was the States of this Commonwealth of Australia that did initiate proposed changes to the Federal Body of the Parliament of the Commonwealth (since 1973 become the Australian Government). The States have intended to ask of the Federal Australian Government to make changes to the Federal Parliament in relation to the Sovereignty of Australia.

The States have attempted to by pass Section 128 of the Constitution by referendum of the people, to change a Line of Authority in the States from the Commonwealth of Australia in God, King and Country to that of “Australia” incepted in secret meetings in 1973.

Sovereignty in International Waters within the scope of the Treaties of Versailles in 1919 wherein William M Morris Hughes did become signatory for the Commonwealth of Australia as an independent and sovereign country is not defined by legislation of Parliament. The blessings handed down by Almighty God are defined in the spilling of blood by ANZAC across battlefields in defence of the Commonwealth of Australia by its creation in Debates of Federation the previous century and the Royal Law is defined by the Scripture in that blessing of Almighty God.

An Act to enable the constitutional arrangements affecting the Commonwealth and the States to be brought into conformity with the status of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation

And whereas it has been agreed that the Parliament of the Commonwealth at the request of the Parliaments of the States in pursuance of section 51(xxxviii) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia should enact an Act in the terms of the First Schedule:

a) Sovereignty is not defined under legislation.
b) Commonwealth of Australia became Sovereign when entering the League of Nations
c) Sovereignty is a Land Claim under blessing of Almighty God
d) Section 51 is legislative powers under the blessing of Almighty God then the Crown, then the Constitution as defined by the Preamble to the Constitution Act.

We could go into the Australia Act 1986 in further detail later, but the premise here is that a State of the Commonwealth, has taken upon itself to bypass the rule of the people who are the Commonwealth to change a line of authority back to a Constitution that defines that people.

Sovereignty in International Waters is a Land Claim under that blessing of Almighty God, it is those Royal Laws that allow for the land to be raised up out of the International Waters and therefore defined by the Shrine of Remembrance within the Kings Domain.

The States have taken to using Section 51 to undermine the Line of Authority defined above it in God and the Kings Domain by attempting to redefine what is already defined in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act and the actions of ANZAC in the defence of that created Commonwealth of Australia.

We can see by Clause 7, and Clause 8 (already mentioned) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 UK/PGA that laws of the council that created the Federal Unity are repealed, and that any law regarding a State or a Colony not becoming a State can also be repealed, with Clause 8 clearly defining the Commonwealth of Australia as a colony itself.

The unity of the people to be a Commonwealth of Australia is what then gave a line of authority to the colonies allowing them to become States. And herein you have a State attempting by way of requests to the “Australian Government” to undermine this very line of authority that is the people themselves.

Repeal of Federal Council Act
The Federal Council of Australasia Act, 1885, is hereby repealed, but so as not to affect any laws passed by the Federal Council of Australasia and in force at the establishment of the Commonwealth. Any such law may be repealed as to any State by the Parliament of the Commonwealth, or as to any colony not being a State by the Parliament thereof.

Instead of going to Referendum under Section 128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act July 1900 to make changes clearly defined in the Preamble to the Act, the States instead made request of the Australian Government to make changes under Section 51(28) of the Constitution at Clause 9 of the Act.

The Constitution at Section 116 forbids the Parliament from legislating on matters of religion, and herein you then have the Federal Government making decisions on matters of Sovereignty relative to the States of the Commonwealth of Australia post changes by Letters Patent 1984 to the Office of Governor General of Australia.

By all purpose, the Government is on the shoulder of Christ, and the Royal Law forms the foundations at law for the Government to exist in the first place. This is forged in International Waters by recognition by way of defending what is created. Easily demonstrated by the actions of ANZAC and William M Morris Hughes at the end of the Great War 1914-1918. Now you have a Government attempting to redefine, and later ask for a Preamble to a Constitution where one already exists with changes that have not been addressed.

Isaiah 9:6 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given:
and the government shall be upon his shoulder:
and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor,
The mighty God,
The everlasting Father,
The Prince of Peace.

Legislative powers of the Parliament
The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:

 (xxxviii)  the exercise within the Commonwealth, at the request or with the concurrence of the Parliaments of all the States directly concerned, of any power which can at the establishment of this Constitution be exercised only by the Parliament of the United Kingdom or by the Federal Council of Australasia;

a) Sovereignty confers powers to the Constitution under the blessing of Almighty God and the Crown as defined by the Preamble to the Constitution Act.
b) Section 51 is limited to a power established by the Constitution
c) Schedule Oath defines the Monarch of a Crown
d) The Parliament of the United Kingdom ceased authority in Imperial Conference 1926
e) The United Kingdom ceased by Royal Style and Title in 1927.
f) There is no power which can be exercised only by the United Kingdom as at 1926.
g) Robert Menzies did commit to a power foreign in 1939 being Great Britain.
h) The Federal Council of Australasia was repealed in Clause 7 of the Constitution Act

What we can see here is that the Parliament or Australian Government have attempted through the use of legislation of the States post changes to the Office of Governor-General of Australia (not the Commonwealth of Australia) to realign the States with the Office of that Governor-General.

The States have used legislation in attempt to undermine the blessing of Almighty God and the Kingdom established by Kings Domain with Shrine and Stone of Remembrance constructed in remembrance of, and reliance in a defined line of authority recognised in International Treaty as an independent and Sovereign Commonwealth.

Genesis 28:22 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
22 and this stone, which I have set for a pillar, shall be God’s house: and of all that thou shalt give me I will surely give the tenth unto thee.

We dont need to go into the specifics of the Australia Act itself to see that the States using legislation to ask the Australian Government to undermine what is established in scripture by Royal Law and the sacrifice of 60,000 men in defence of that creation.

It also becomes clear why the Federal Parliament shall not legislate on matters of religion, like Christian Porter MP attempted to so blatantly do in his Religious Discrimination Bill. The reasons for this cannot be understated, the Royal Law in the Scripture forms the very land claim that gave rise to the Constitution in the first place, with the Ministers of the Parliament under the blessing of the people themselves.

James 2:9 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
but if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.

It is in knowing God, that you realise, the State Governments have attempted to undermine the authority that is in the very people themselves, by aligning their bankrupted institutions with a Federal Body that can now be demonstrated to lack the blessings laid down by God.

Visits: 362

4 thoughts on “Facts Part 28

  1. G’Day
    I hope everyone is well
    Just putting it out there…..
    I Received shirts in the mail last week
    They fit perfectly are of great quality and the printed designs look wonderful.
    It’s a tick in every box from me
    Very happy thank you.

  2. A very interesting read, our religious freedom is being attacked slowly In my community they are attacking our Holy communion and the closures of our churches last year all due to a direction of Health orders, we can clearly see our Constitutional rights are being ignored.

    1. This is not about your religious freedom, that is backed up by ICCPR Article 18 and 19.

      This is about your LACK OF SOVEREIGNTY as a people and being able to identify the CORE OF THAT SOVEREIGN RIGHT.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.